I can't comment about the minimum number of stores, but I do think its the correct idea. I live in a town of ~12000. We have 6.5 bookstores (including the good local thrift store as .5). Stores/restaurants do turn over fairly regularly, so its still tough, but it certainly seems viable. We get a good number of tourists, which helps but I do think you need a mix of restaurants, and a mix of different types of stores. Even as you go to nearby towns with big box stores, they all have downtowns that are doing ok with locally run businesses. Notably the downtowns all are small business focused with few if any box stores

Within the US, energy prices for are typically split into supply and distribution rates with taxes and fees added to each of these. There are typically a large number of these fees that are passed through to the consumer, but just are bundled together to reduce confusion. An example fee is one for keeping power plants idle as extra capacity for when it's needed. Electricity has a nationwide market with different prices for spot prices vs long term although if you are big enough you can also get a direct contract to hedge your energy supply prices.

The complaint here is that PJM is spending money on upgrading the long range wires and passing that fee in a way that's not calculated for usage but instead it's likely divided evenly amongst member states. If you're upgrading wires in PA why should Maryland pay for that? These would taking in new/higher fees being passed to consumers.

The long range transmission lines are different than short term transmission lines. The long range ones appear someone to hit electricity from a power plant in California for a business in Baltimore.

And the counterpoint is that for the resident of Maryland, paying a little now to upgrade long distance transmission lines will save them money in the long run, because it will allow them to benefit from cheap solar power from California in the evenings and cheap solar from new York in the mornings.

More transmission = more places to find lower prices.

This is essentially what some 3rd party vendors do, which is why supply chain malware is typically found in hours now and not weeks.

The reason why npmjs, pypy and other public registries don't do this is because it would likely 10x+ the cost of their infrastructure while not bringing in much new revenue. It's also potentially orthogonal to paint customers needs since it could likely lead to downtime or at least block new releases going out

Other airports do have ads for tech companies (Seattle comes to mind) but the concentration is significantly lower.

Billboards are primarily focused on brand awareness since you can't update them frequently and you don't have amazing targeting/attribution data. They're also hyper-geographic specific. For tech companies that means that billboards are most useful when targeting either a specific conference or when targeting people that can make sales decisions.

Sf's billboard space is heavily used by the tech industry because A) you've got a high concentration of consumers for your tech product (developers, marketers, operations, product managers, etc) B) you've got a high concentration of decision-makers in terms of director/VP/execs/consultants going through that airport who may end up making a final decision on your sales. C) you've got a concentration of investors in terms of VC, private equity, angel investors. This helps bring in interest for that next round/acquisition. For your existing investors this means that they've got something to brag about. D) hometown pride. Companies tend to put billboards near where executives travel through since it's a reminder of the work that the marketer is doing. It also helps with hiring and media reputation.

If you compare SF to NYC or Boston, those other cities have a much smaller amount of their workforce in tech (22% compared to 11%). This is especially true if you think about the number of people transferring at these airports. The concentration of customers just isn't there, which is why NYC ads tend to be more consumer driven.

For people to care of would have to be like healthcare. The Change Healthcare breach cost 2B+ and led to a huge loss in market share. Or like AMCA, which went bankrupt after the breach (Labcorp's billing company). If you're a health tech company you can no longer insure your way out of the problem over you reach a certain size.

The reality is that we need data breaches to be painful but maybe not company ending events unless it really is sensitive data. As patio11 likes to say the right level of fraud is not zero. There's a middle ground where we can increase company liability or reduce the damage caused by a beach.

Optum360, still in business. HCA Healthcare, still in business. Excellus Healthcare, still in business after paying something like 50 cents per breached user. AMCA went out of business because their biggest customers said "damage control dictates we cut ties with you so we don't look complacent" (that is, like I said, the customers have to care to make a difference). And did anyone stop going to LabCore (after their own data breach, not AMCAs) or got a different doctor because the healthcare group they're part of got breached? Not likely. I don't think healthcare is ahead of the game here.

But yes, until it becomes actually painful to companies and the people who run them, it won't get better. If a corp death penalty is off the table (I don't think it should be), I guess would be either/both proportionate fines (fines equaling a couple of hours of revenue don't cut it) or making some of the leadership personally accountable, a la SOX fines, asset forfeiture and criminal responsibility for responsible C-level execs. Hate on SOX all you want, it sure made finance executives care about what is going on in their organization.

If you're in the northeast US it's very common to have free or have to pay a nominal fee for public tennis courts (this may depend on the quality of your town's Park and rec department)

In NYC, it's 15/hr or 100/season. In the town I grew up in it's 20/yr for residents and 40/yr for non residents. I'm my current town it's free. And I suspect that there are waivers/discounts for folks that can't pay that amount.

This is much more viable than it was in the past with the advent and adoption of nvm, pyenv etc but the limiting factor becomes system dependencies. The typical example from yesteryear was upgrading openssl but inevitably you'll find that some dependency auto updates a system dependency silently or requires a newer version that requires upgrading the OS.

So why are you using a Linux that forces that on you?

Sane people use Debian, Debian packages are compatible with the Debian release they are from. I do not have to worry about accidentally installing an incompatible deb; even if I try to, apt won't allow me to install a package whose deps cannot be satisfied because they're too new (and thus, not in my release's package repo).

I know other distros have problems with release management, but this is why I've used Debian for the past 20 years and will continue to use Debian

>Debian packages are compatible with the Debian release they are from.

That won't save you if an application requires newer tooling or libraries than whatever is in Debian stable. Once that happens the application needs to bundle its dependencies. But that is precisely why people use containers.

You say container, but if you're at AWS, for example, and you're using any API of theirs, either the original deprecated EC2 API, or the Docker API, or the Kubernetes API... its all a real honest to god VM underneath, provided by Firecracker.

In other words, the technology I have used non-stop since it was mainlined in 2008 is the technology all of you use today. I can deploy a VM, you can deploy a VM, the difference is the API we use to do it, but they're all VMs.

And yes, my VMs are not required to be Debian Stable, and I can deploy any version as needed. That is why we have VMs, so we do not need to dedicate entire machines to a single application with unusual dependencies. Something big companies like Amazon and Google and Microsoft realized is the true wisdom that sysadmins like me have always known: even the damned kernel is a dep that should be tracked, and sometimes this does matter, and the only way you can deploy kernels on a per-application basis is with VMs.

Something container jockeys will never understand: containers that are offered through the OCI facility in the kernel has multiple discrete userlands, but one kernel. You do not have a hypervisor with its own kernel.

Docker, real namebrand Docker, is an OCI consumer. Using something that implements a compatible API is not Docker, but merely a compatibility shim.

In new England at least, independent bookstores appear to be thriving. The town I'm in (population ~12K) has at least 5 independent bookstores, all in a town with a great library. That's an unusually high number of bookstores but most of the larger towns have at least one independent bookstore.

Something popular in my area, especially in the somatics community, are grief ceremonies ala https://www.earthdance.net/event/grieving-ourselves-whole-ex... although there are several variations. If that feels too new age-y or its not offered near where you live, it may be worth looking for grief groups/bereavement support, either through your preferred religious institution or through the local medical community (they're often supported by your local hospital)

VC funding is often required for companies that require a lot of runway prior to selling. The example that comes to mind are database companies like Mongo, dgraph, scylla etc. These require a fair amount of upfront work to create the product before their usable. A different example are industries that require a fair amount of compliance like healthcare, banking etc