Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> the primary beneficiaries of this bill were to be Bell, Rogers, Shaw, and some CBC.

Yes, owners and creators of Canadian media content. For Canadians.

From TFA:

> The Internet platforms are losers as they comply with an unreasonable law by removing links and making their services objectively worse in order to do so. Individual Canadians who use the platforms to find links to news are losers since news links will be blocked from the platform. And the government is a loser, as having dismissed critics and ignored repeated warnings about the risks associated with its bill, it has now left Canada as the global example of digital policy disastrously gone wrong.

i) I accept what Geist asserts, that the US social media business will be worse without Canadian news. Having Canadian news content in these billion-dollar US companies' products should not be free for these companies.

ii) Canadian media must do better for Canadians. Canadian news is not US news.

iii) US media companies don't want to start paying US journalism either. Rich US companies are fighting to resist the precedent that this law set in Australia and will set in Canada.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: