Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Because the output contains evidence of thought processes that have been established as leading to valid solutions to problems.

This sort of claim always just reminds me of Lucky's monologue in Waiting for Godot.



You're not wrong. It's an artifact of rewriting the definition of reason into a sentence that begins with "Because the output ..."


I didn't mean the wording itself; I meant that the claim isn't convincing to me for the same reason that Lucky's speech doesn't demonstrate an intelligent speaker.


Why not get curious instead?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: