Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Why does being earlier make it more or less remarkable? There were no relevant developments over the intervening period.


Earlier discoveries are always more remarkable.


(A) How?

(B) This wouldn't be a discovery in either case.


(A) Inventing / discovering calculus in the 16th century is very impressive, doing the same in the 20th century much less so. (Indeed this has happened several times.)

(B) It would be a remarkable anticipation, which is similar.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: