> Apache 2.0 across the board, so commercial use is clean.

Did you just stop when you saw open source and come post this here because you couldn't be bothered to... look at the project and see it's cleanly and clearly listed.

Edit: Like. I get it. It's fine to question open source. But this isn't hidden. It's repeated and made clear multiple times. They even link to the license: https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0

It wasn't hidden, it wasn't in some weird, out-of-the-way place. In fact, I found it so easily that I genuinely questioned whether it was real because of your comment. Like, why would anyone post what you posted if it was this easy to find?

NOPE! It was right there.

If you check HF you will see its Apache2 and the datasets were also permissive.

It's one of the few models on the market where the creator indemnifies it against copyright claims.

https://research.ibm.com/blog/granite-ethical-ai

https://github.com/ibm-granite

> the complete recipes to make the models.

You mean the weights which most companies don't release. Again you can find from that link.

No I didn't mean the weights, but the source code to make the weights.

The granite site covers everything you keep asking for. Granite is made using lm-engine and the details are there.

Without the weights you are not going to be able to build to the same level of accuracy without some serious work.

I think it’s fair if you use a bit more than 5 seconds as someone stated above. I would gladly be proven stupid.

https://huggingface.co/ibm-granite

I think if you were genuinely interested, you could have found this yourself.

https://allenai.org/olmo

I'm just giving it as an example. I haven't looked at Granite's repos.